SAN FRANCISCO (AP) 鈥 Meta has prevailed over an existential challenge to its business that could have forced the tech giant to spin off Instagram and WhatsApp after a judge ruled that the company does not hold a monopoly in social networking.
U.S. District Judge James Boasberg issued his ruling Tuesday after the historic antitrust trial wrapped up in late May. His decision runs in sharp contrast to two separate rulings that branded Google an and , dealing regulatory blows to the tech industry that for years enjoyed nearly unbridled growth.
The Federal Trade Commission 鈥渃ontinues to insist that Meta competes with the same old rivals it has for the last decade, that the company holds a monopoly among that small set, and that it maintained that monopoly through anticompetitive acquisitions,鈥 Boasberg wrote in his ruling. 鈥淲hether or not Meta enjoyed monopoly power in the past, though, the agency must show that it continues to hold such power now. The Court鈥檚 verdict today determines that the FTC has not done so.鈥
The federal agency had argued that Meta maintained a monopoly by pursuing an expression CEO Mark Zuckerberg made in 2008: 鈥溾業t is better to buy than compete.鈥 True to that maxim, Facebook has systematically tracked potential rivals and acquired companies that it viewed as serious competitive threats.鈥
During his April testimony, Zuckerberg pushed back against claims that Facebook bought Instagram to neutralize a threat. In his line of questioning, FTC attorney Daniel Matheson repeatedly brought up emails 鈥 many of them more than a decade old 鈥 written by Zuckerberg and his associates before and after the acquisition of Instagram.
While acknowledging the documents, Zuckerberg has often sought to downplay the contents, saying he wrote the emails early in the acquisition process and that the notes did not fully capture the scope of his interest in the company. But the case was not about the acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp more than a decade ago, which the FTC approved at the time, but about whether Meta holds a monopoly now. Prosecutors, Boasberg wrote in the ruling, could only win if they proved 鈥渃urrent or imminent legal violation.鈥
The FTC鈥檚 complaint said Facebook also enacted policies designed to make it difficult for smaller rivals to enter the market and 鈥渘eutralize perceived competitive threats,鈥 just as the world shifted its attention to mobile devices from desktop computers.
Meta said Tuesday's decision 鈥渞ecognizes that Meta faces fierce competition.鈥
鈥淥ur products are beneficial for people and businesses and exemplify American innovation and economic growth. We look forward to continuing to partner with the Administration and to invest in America,鈥 said Jennifer Newstead, chief legal officer, in a statement.
The social media landscape has changed so much since the FTC filed its lawsuit in 2020, Boasberg wrote, that each time the court examined Meta's apps and competition, they changed. Two opinions to dismiss the case 鈥 filed in 2021 and 2022 鈥 didn't even mention popular social video platform TikTok. Today, it 鈥渉olds center stage as Meta's fiercest rival.鈥
Quoting the Greek philosopher Heraclitus, 鈥渢hat no man can ever step into the same river twice,鈥 Boasberg said the same is true for the online world of social media as well.
鈥淭he landscape that existed only five years ago when the Federal Trade Commission brought this antitrust suit has changed markedly. While it once might have made sense to partition apps into separate markets of social networking and social media, that wall has since broken down,鈥 he wrote.
Emarketer analyst Minda Smiley said Meta's win 鈥渋s not necessarily surprising considering the lengths it鈥檚 gone to in recent years to keep up with TikTok.鈥
鈥淏ut from a regulatory standpoint, Meta is far from out of the woods: next year, major social networks will face landmark trials in the US regarding children鈥檚 mental health,鈥 she added. "Still, today鈥檚 win is surely a boost for the company as it battles criticism and questions over how its massive AI spending will ultimately benefit Meta in the long run.鈥
Facebook bought Instagram 鈥 then a scrappy photo-sharing app with no ads and a small cult following 鈥 in 2012. The $1 billion cash and stock purchase price was eye-popping at the time, though the deal鈥檚 value fell to $750 million after Facebook鈥檚 stock price dipped following its initial public offering in May 2012.
Instagram was the first company Facebook bought and kept running as a separate app. Up until then, Facebook was known for smaller 鈥渁cqui-hires鈥 鈥 a type of popular Silicon Valley deal in which a company purchases a startup as a way to hire its talented workers, then shuts the acquired company down. Two years later, it did it again with the messaging app WhatsApp, which it .
WhatsApp and Instagram helped Facebook move its business from desktop computers to mobile devices, and to remain popular with younger generations as rivals like Snapchat (which it also tried, but failed, to buy) and TikTok emerged. However, the FTC has a narrow definition of Meta鈥檚 competitive market, excluding companies like TikTok, YouTube and Apple鈥檚 messaging service from being considered rivals to Instagram and WhatsApp.
Investors didn't appear surprised at the ruling. Shares of the Menlo Park, California-based company were down $1.52 at $600.49 in afternoon trading Tuesday, in line with broader market trends.
